Teebonesnek

Players Admins Fourteen

Ooh, they won't be the only one, judging from your playtime ) two

4 times we're gonna add another 6.3k posts to this thread

2 times we come back

Two times it's the journey, not the destination

6 times this channel is a heavy-handed allegory for Sisyphus

Four times we've been knocked down and come back

Six more posts

Two devastating notifications:

Four reasons we're so back

2 reasons we're all in this together

4 times we're gonna make it

Two more posts in that valiant attempt

3 attempts to make it to 10

1 admin complaint Admin(s) Key: coolrune Your ckey (Byond username): teebonesnek Your Discord name (if applicable): teebonesnek Date(s) of incident (GMT preferred): 14/06/24 ROUND ID: Nature of complaint: miscondugt, abuse of powers (Select all that apply: EG - clarification required, misapplication of rules, misconduct, abuse of powers, feedback, other) Links to all relevant ban appeals for any bans related to this complaint: Brief description (tl;dr here. Just the critical elements): fun police :( Full description of events: shut down our highscore of 7

6 glorious returns of the counting post

Four posts breaking records here

Two trial admins sabotaging the count

Two forum users struggling against overwhelming odds to count past three

Two ChatGPT'd ban appeals

2 ponderings of the universe

Hi, I like your post but I think there are a few issues with your proposals. While para's validhunting rules could maybe be made clearer they're generally in a good place right now. There are a couple of problems with allowing the use of lethal force against antagonists as a non-security crew member: 1. You're just some random NanoTrasen employee, for most characters and situations it makes very little sense that you would be prepared to lay down your life to protect a coworker instead of fleeing and calling for the team of jackbooted thugs that do this for a living like you're trained to do. Additionally, if you kill someone without being able to provably demonstrate that your life or your coworker's life was in serious danger it's clearly murder, and demonstrating this beyond reasonable doubt is difficult to do. 2. There is a fundamental problem with being able to use lethal force as a crew member for the defence of someone else - if any coworker is attacked you could usually just lethal the antagonist since if you try to interfere with an antagonist where you shouldn't, they're just going to attempt to execute you and continue their task, as well they should. This provides justification for you to attempt to kill them and would lead to antagonist gameplay feeling a lot more crew vs antagonist instead of security vs antagonist, in my opinion. Overall I think your suggestions are reasonable and well considered, but I feel that the current system of lethal force only to save your own life and only when there's no other option provides the healthiest gameplay for both crew members and antagonists. The antagonists aren't swamped by crew members rushing to stop them in defence of their friends since the crew members understand the high risk of unceremonious death and the crew members will be treated more easily by antagonists when they interfere less, and escape with minimal injuries more often. This also allows for stronger rules against collateral damage with antags, since bystanders represent less of a threat to the antagonist when they're not going to attempt to murder them.

One beepsky barking

Eleven

Your plushies are so cute I want them all for my morgue plushie collection The rest of your art is also very nice, you have a very unique style of pixel art!