Plotron

I'm against giving SPECIAL weapons to people who already have SPECIAL weapons. Like seriously, can't you see that's powercreep? In this case, adjusting to your argument, it doesn't matter if it's ranged or not, as you have proven it is irrelevant if we're giving someone more melee weapons or ranged weapons. It's bad either way.

Special privilege. RANGED.

I was talking about the video (and movie immersions), not about the top-hat IG. I have nothing against having the top-hat as a traitor item. In fact, I think it'd be interesting. It's enough that you can get people to play RR, and if someone loses (you don't even have to play it yourself), you can loot the body. Bartender has received lots of love. Lethal love.

Stop the bartender's power creep. He's got armor, a shotgun that can be turned lethal, a RR, and now you want to give him a legit weapon that is semi-concealed and non-intrusive, as if he was some kind of an antag. That video is ridiculous, by the way, totally breaking any kind of immersion.

In order to actually contribute, you need to get a PR going on the Github. This is the place where suggestions are ultimately (or actually, rather) accepted or shot down.

Delete thread pliz.

I don't recall seeing basketball hoops in holodeck...

Preferrably to Holodeck. Just the way it is in Prison Station, it's a cool little game.

Or cows.

I asked in OOC and Magikarp came up with following requirements: Bio: 3 Materials: 2/3 Data Theory: 2/3 I propose that intuitively: Bio: 3 Materials: 2 Data Theory: 3 An incentive to learn Github...

It's been debated already. Your argument is deemed invalid because: a) BoH in BoH is a fancy reference that is loved by our coders. It is so old that it's basically become an argumentum ad antiquitatem. b) BoH in BoH is balanced. Balanced against bans. Sorry, but as you can see, your argument is invalid.

Explains why my special package for the RD never got there. Anyway, add it. It's been suggested already, let's do it.

Gah! That's nothing! I remember ghosts saving a shadowling once when it hatched out in a dimly lit room. Where's Thunderdome? I want Thunderdome. Why haven't you thought of Thunderdome? Can't we just automate Thunderdome?

Yes. Maybe it makes it 'balanced' in some ridiculous way?

I dream about SS13 everyday. But it's only dreams, wishful thinking or some fictional universe I like playing with in my mind. I think it'd fit better in general discussion, so our suggestion forum isn't just filled with dreams. I think that not caring is a good way of dealing with this.

Make it so only like special Kidan superiors have mesons in the lore, and the others are just guided, mindless workers. Lol. But yes, what Fox said - Kidan OP against mining mobs.

Why is this in suggestions? I mean, this is a fundamental... total conversion mod? It will never be coded on Para. Too much work, not enough coders, and it isn't even proven to work gameplay-wise.

My medical characters are all shortsighted. I'm telling you - I couldn't give less of a fuck about seeing who's in crit and who is not - all you need is a bunch of scans, and they're more precise.

You can play security officer decently, but with limited tactical options. You can play medical doctor as well as a typical human. You don't need MedHUD for anything bar modifying records. Regarding mining - well, a shaft miner with bonus 20 brute armor sounds too good to be true.

stay on topic, there are plenty of threads to complain about sec in He is on topic. 1. Chainsaw is meant to be fearsome (not fearsome at all if you can stun with one shot). 2. Chainsaw + STIM combo is meant to make one-shot taser secguys wet their pants, because their favourite weapon will not even disarm the chainsaw-wielder. 3. Chainsaw is !!FUN!! as it doesn't end with a single tase (so special!). 4. Therefore we shouldn't nerf the STIM. His logical argument is logical indeed. Argue with the premises instead of bitching about his dislike for current stun mechanics. Personally, I have no opinion.

No reasoning here apart from "No thanks". Negative opinion of the IRC in general. You said it's your experience that the IRC is the way it is. I say that you could argue on this basis that IRC is detrimental or unnecessary but not that the bot is detrimental or unnecessary. The only possible argument in that post was against IRC. It was a red herring. You spoke bad of the IRC, not of the bot. The closest of making an argument was the statement that IRC "is a den for people to whine" in your post, and that's what I pointed out. You haven't explained your reasoning against the bot itself. This is what you seemed to say: 1. IRC is a den for people to whine about their metagrudges in my experience anyhow. 2. Therefore we don't need the IRC playerlist bot back. It's non-sequitur. Now we're getting closer. According to these snippets of information I think that you do not want visible playerlists because of metagrudging assholes who would abuse the information. Is that right? Please confirm so we can move forward with the argument.

What a nerf.

Shouldn't IPCs also have modifiable genetics? Unless it got removed somewhere along the way, injectors still work on IPCs.

This has nothing to do with bringing back a bot. You made an argument against having IRC in the first place. It's irrelevant to this discussion. I am not arguing against your experience (experiences shouldn't be argued against), I'm merely not seeing the connection between your experience and your statement that we should not bring the bot back.

Explain why. Personally I've never been on Para's IRC and I do not intend to ever be. Show me your reasoning and I'll point out the fallacies.