Taaketa Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 The only time I see anyone use them is to troll Tcomms. Nuff said. Link to comment https://www.paradisestation.org/forum/topic/8545-disable-pda-chatrooms/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeGuy9283 Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 They have their uses, but I think there should be some sort of OCC warning that they can mess up Tcomms. Additionally, using it a an antag for sabotage should be off limits. Link to comment https://www.paradisestation.org/forum/topic/8545-disable-pda-chatrooms/#findComment-73326 Share on other sites More sharing options...
FPK Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 They have potential, but no one ever uses them unless it's to fuck up t-comms. I could give them a chance, but frankly I don't think it's worth keeping if they fuck up t-comms all the time. Link to comment https://www.paradisestation.org/forum/topic/8545-disable-pda-chatrooms/#findComment-73343 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadeykins Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 I've seen them used legitimately. Here's an easy solution. Limit a chatroom to 6-8 participants. Link to comment https://www.paradisestation.org/forum/topic/8545-disable-pda-chatrooms/#findComment-73461 Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexpkeaton Posted October 26, 2016 Posted October 26, 2016 Additionally, using it a an antag for sabotage should be off limits. This. It should be an addition to the server rules, or rather a clarification, as exploiting a bug is already a no-no. If you are an antag and crash tcomms, you better have a damn good excuse when you get bwoinked. Shadey is also right that chat rooms really only need 6-8 members. At least until the coding bug is fixed. Link to comment https://www.paradisestation.org/forum/topic/8545-disable-pda-chatrooms/#findComment-73620 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts