Difference between revisions of "User:Sirryan2002/WikiStandards"

From Paradise Station Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Messing around with some ideas)
 
(→‎What Makes a Good Article: added this section)
Line 2: Line 2:


==What Makes a Good Article==
==What Makes a Good Article==
* Introduction
** Context
* Structure
** Beginning
** Middle
** End
* Uniformity
** Template Usage
* Utility
* Media
* Prose
** Grammar
** Rhetoric
** Literary Elements
* Look
* Code
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:99%">
<span style="font-size:1.2em;">'''Grade GA (Good Article)'''</span><br>
A Good Article:
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
# '''Well written:'''
## the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
## and it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias;
## and it complies with the Paradise manual of style guidelines.
# '''Original:'''
## It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
## It does not steal articles from other wikis(inspiration/modeling from other wikis, however, is encouraged)
# '''Broad in its coverage:'''
## it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
## and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
# '''Informative'''
## It provides all ''necessary'' information;
## and provides references to other articles
# '''Illustrated'''
## Includes high quality images/gifs of the subject matter;
## and Includes Images for Example/Hypothetical situations that complement the article if necessary;
## and has Diagrams/Marked-Up/annotated Images where needed too help the reader better understand the subject matter
# '''Standardized'''
## Pages are uniform with other pages of its type;
## and relevant and proper Templates are used.
# '''Enjoyable'''
## Minor and Light humor are included;
## and formatting is easy on the eyes.
</div></div>


==Revising Articles==
==Revising Articles==

Revision as of 16:08, 29 March 2021

Please keep in mind that these are in no way official and are instead my(Sirryan2002) take on the standards our wiki should follow

What Makes a Good Article

  • Introduction
    • Context
  • Structure
    • Beginning
    • Middle
    • End
  • Uniformity
    • Template Usage
  • Utility
  • Media
  • Prose
    • Grammar
    • Rhetoric
    • Literary Elements
  • Look
  • Code



Grade GA (Good Article)
A Good Article:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
    2. and it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias;
    3. and it complies with the Paradise manual of style guidelines.
  2. Original:
    1. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
    2. It does not steal articles from other wikis(inspiration/modeling from other wikis, however, is encouraged)
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
    2. and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
  4. Informative
    1. It provides all necessary information;
    2. and provides references to other articles
  5. Illustrated
    1. Includes high quality images/gifs of the subject matter;
    2. and Includes Images for Example/Hypothetical situations that complement the article if necessary;
    3. and has Diagrams/Marked-Up/annotated Images where needed too help the reader better understand the subject matter
  6. Standardized
    1. Pages are uniform with other pages of its type;
    2. and relevant and proper Templates are used.
  7. Enjoyable
    1. Minor and Light humor are included;
    2. and formatting is easy on the eyes.

Revising Articles

When an Article Requires a Rewrite

Occasionally, an article is so outdated, messy, or overall badly written that it requires a general/complete rewrite. This is often due to multiple authors contributing in ways that deviate from the original/main theme/style/purpose of the page or continue a trend of low-quality edits. This need for a rewrite is not an insult to the contributors but a means of improving the article and condensing all of that knowledge into better digestible and informative articles.

So when does an Article need a rewrite?

  1. The Article does not inform the reader about the matter being discussed
  2. The Article does not have any formatting and is a wall of text
  3. The flow of the article is not logical and requires a lot of jumping around in order to read it.
  4. The article is very outdated