Difference between revisions of "User:Sirryan2002/WikiStandards"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sirryan2002 (talk | contribs) (Messing around with some ideas) |
Sirryan2002 (talk | contribs) (→What Makes a Good Article: added this section) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==What Makes a Good Article== | ==What Makes a Good Article== | ||
* Introduction | |||
** Context | |||
* Structure | |||
** Beginning | |||
** Middle | |||
** End | |||
* Uniformity | |||
** Template Usage | |||
* Utility | |||
* Media | |||
* Prose | |||
** Grammar | |||
** Rhetoric | |||
** Literary Elements | |||
* Look | |||
* Code | |||
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="width:99%"> | |||
<span style="font-size:1.2em;">'''Grade GA (Good Article)'''</span><br> | |||
A Good Article: | |||
<div class="mw-collapsible-content"> | |||
# '''Well written:''' | |||
## the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; | |||
## and it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias; | |||
## and it complies with the Paradise manual of style guidelines. | |||
# '''Original:''' | |||
## It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. | |||
## It does not steal articles from other wikis(inspiration/modeling from other wikis, however, is encouraged) | |||
# '''Broad in its coverage:''' | |||
## it addresses the main aspects of the topic; | |||
## and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. | |||
# '''Informative''' | |||
## It provides all ''necessary'' information; | |||
## and provides references to other articles | |||
# '''Illustrated''' | |||
## Includes high quality images/gifs of the subject matter; | |||
## and Includes Images for Example/Hypothetical situations that complement the article if necessary; | |||
## and has Diagrams/Marked-Up/annotated Images where needed too help the reader better understand the subject matter | |||
# '''Standardized''' | |||
## Pages are uniform with other pages of its type; | |||
## and relevant and proper Templates are used. | |||
# '''Enjoyable''' | |||
## Minor and Light humor are included; | |||
## and formatting is easy on the eyes. | |||
</div></div> | |||
==Revising Articles== | ==Revising Articles== |
Revision as of 16:08, 29 March 2021
Please keep in mind that these are in no way official and are instead my(Sirryan2002) take on the standards our wiki should follow
What Makes a Good Article
- Introduction
- Context
- Structure
- Beginning
- Middle
- End
- Uniformity
- Template Usage
- Utility
- Media
- Prose
- Grammar
- Rhetoric
- Literary Elements
- Look
- Code
Grade GA (Good Article)
A Good Article:
- Well written:
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- and it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias;
- and it complies with the Paradise manual of style guidelines.
- Original:
- It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
- It does not steal articles from other wikis(inspiration/modeling from other wikis, however, is encouraged)
- Broad in its coverage:
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic;
- and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
- Informative
- It provides all necessary information;
- and provides references to other articles
- Illustrated
- Includes high quality images/gifs of the subject matter;
- and Includes Images for Example/Hypothetical situations that complement the article if necessary;
- and has Diagrams/Marked-Up/annotated Images where needed too help the reader better understand the subject matter
- Standardized
- Pages are uniform with other pages of its type;
- and relevant and proper Templates are used.
- Enjoyable
- Minor and Light humor are included;
- and formatting is easy on the eyes.
Revising Articles
When an Article Requires a Rewrite
Occasionally, an article is so outdated, messy, or overall badly written that it requires a general/complete rewrite. This is often due to multiple authors contributing in ways that deviate from the original/main theme/style/purpose of the page or continue a trend of low-quality edits. This need for a rewrite is not an insult to the contributors but a means of improving the article and condensing all of that knowledge into better digestible and informative articles.
So when does an Article need a rewrite?
- The Article does not inform the reader about the matter being discussed
- The Article does not have any formatting and is a wall of text
- The flow of the article is not logical and requires a lot of jumping around in order to read it.
- The article is very outdated